Short answer: In a real estate joint venture, the promote is the extra share of profit the sponsor earns once the deal clears agreed return hurdles, on top of what its own cash investment entitles it to. It is real estate's version of carried interest. For tax, the promote is a profits interest in a partnership: it is usually not taxed when granted, the partnership allocates taxable income so each partner's capital account tracks the waterfall, and the sponsor's share keeps the character of the deal's income. Because most gain on selling a building is section 1231 gain, the three-year holding rule that hits fund managers' carry often does not bite on a real estate promote.

Who is who

A typical deal has two sides, both partners in an LLC or limited partnership taxed as a partnership:

  • the sponsor, also called the operating partner or GP, which finds the property, runs the business plan and usually puts in a small slice of the equity; and
  • the capital partner, often an institutional investor or a fund, which puts in most of the equity.

Without a promote, profits would be shared in proportion to the cash each side put in. The promote changes that: once the capital partner has received an agreed return, the sponsor takes a bigger share of every further dollar than its cash would justify.

How a promote waterfall works

The distribution waterfall sets the order in which cash is paid out. A common real estate structure:

  • Step 1: return of capital to both partners, in proportion to what they contributed.
  • Step 2: preferred return to both partners, for example an 8% annual return on their capital.
  • Step 3: promote tiers. Above the preferred return, cash is split in a way that favours the sponsor, often in steps measured by IRR: for example 70/30 until the capital partner reaches a 12% IRR, then 60/40 above that. The sponsor's share in each tier includes both its own pro rata share and the promote.

Some deals measure the hurdles by equity multiple instead of IRR, or use both. Some add a catch-up, where the sponsor takes most of the cash for a while so its total share reaches a target. If the promote can be paid before the deal is over, there is often a clawback that makes the sponsor give some back if later results disappoint.

How the promote is taxed

1. Receiving it: usually no tax

The sponsor's right to the promote is a profits interest: a share of future profits only, with no claim on the capital already in the deal. Under Rev. Proc. 93-27, the IRS does not tax the receipt of a profits interest for services to the partnership, unless one of three exceptions applies: the interest relates to a substantially certain and predictable stream of income, such as income from a high-quality net lease; the sponsor disposes of it within two years; or the partnership is publicly traded. Rev. Proc. 2001-43 extends this to a promote that vests over time, as long as the sponsor is treated as a partner from the start.

To make sure the promote really only shares in future growth, the partnership may revalue its assets (a "book-up") when the promote is granted. Any value that already exists then belongs to the existing partners' capital accounts, not to the sponsor.

2. Allocating income to match the cash

Partnership tax allocations must follow the partners' real economic deal, and the regulations test that through each partner's capital account. Most real estate agreements use targeted allocations: each year, income and loss are allocated so that, if the partnership sold everything at book value and liquidated, each partner's capital account would equal what the waterfall would pay them.

The practical consequence is that the sponsor is allocated taxable income as the promote builds up, often before any promote cash is paid. That can create phantom income for the sponsor, and K-1s that do not line up with distributions in a given year.

3. Character: it keeps the deal's character

Because the promote is a share of partnership income, it keeps the character of that income. Rent is ordinary income. Gain on selling the building is usually section 1231 gain, taxed at long-term capital gains rates, with the part that reflects depreciation taxed as unrecaptured section 1250 gain at up to 25%.

4. The three-year rule, and why real estate often escapes it

Section 1061, added in 2017, requires a three-year holding period, rather than one year, for long-term capital gain allocated on an applicable partnership interest, which includes a sponsor's promote. But the regulations exclude section 1231 gain (and qualified dividends) from that rule. A building held for rent or used in a business is section 1231 property, so promote gain from selling it after more than a year is generally long-term gain even if the building was held for less than three years.

Section 1061 matters more when the gain is a true capital gain, for example when the sponsor sells its interest in the venture or the venture sells shares in a company. The rule also does not apply to the part of the sponsor's return that comes from its own capital in the deal, provided allocations on that capital follow the same terms as the capital partner's.

5. Self-employment tax

A partner's share of rental income from real estate and of gain on selling property is generally excluded from self-employment income, so the promote on those items is usually free of self-employment tax. Fee income the sponsor earns for services, such as acquisition or asset management fees, is a different matter and is taxed as ordinary income.

Worked example

A capital partner contributes $9 million and a sponsor $1 million to a venture that buys an apartment building. The waterfall is:

  • Step 1: return of capital and an 8% preferred return, compounding annually, to both partners pro rata; then
  • Step 2: everything above that split 70% to the capital partner and 30% to the sponsor.

There are no distributions until the venture sells the building after exactly two years for net proceeds of $16 million.

  • Capital plus preferred return: $10 million × 1.08 × 1.08 = $11,664,000, of which $10,497,600 goes to the capital partner and $1,166,400 to the sponsor.
  • Remaining cash: $16,000,000 − $11,664,000 = $4,336,000, split $3,035,200 to the capital partner and $1,300,800 to the sponsor.
  • Totals: capital partner $13,532,800, sponsor $2,467,200.

The total profit is $6 million. Pro rata, the sponsor's 10% would have earned it $600,000 of that. Under the waterfall it earns $1,467,200, so its promote is $867,200.

For tax, assume for simplicity the venture's whole $6 million profit is gain on the sale. Targeted allocations give $1,467,200 of that gain to the sponsor and $4,532,800 to the capital partner, so each partner's capital account matches their cash. The building was held for two years, so the gain is section 1231 gain and is long-term for both partners, including the sponsor's promote, because section 1231 gain is outside the three-year rule. In a real deal, part of the gain would reflect depreciation and be unrecaptured section 1250 gain.

Common trouble spots

  • No book-up at grant. Without a revaluation, a promote granted on an appreciated property can share in value that already existed, which can be taxable to the sponsor and unfair to the capital partner.
  • Cash and tax out of step. Targeted allocations can allocate promote income years before the promote is paid. Sponsors should expect tax distributions to be part of the deal terms.
  • Refinancing proceeds. Cash from a refinancing usually runs through the same waterfall. It is generally not taxable when distributed, but it can move promote allocations forward.
  • Clawbacks. If a promote paid early is later given back, the earlier income allocations may need to be reversed in later years.

This explainer is general information, not tax advice.

Sources

Related reading

This explainer is analysis and general information, not tax, legal or investment advice.